Skip to page content
Existing module retained: its records and examples have not yet been fully adapted to Channel. Do not interpret them as Channel operating data. Open the Channel DEMO

Cross-Site Benchmarking

Every gap is measured against the best actual performer in the portfolio, not a target — because "another one of our own sites already does this" is the benchmark no operation can argue with.

ILI Corrosion & Burst-Pressure Hero Demo ("Days to Dig")

Value of closing every gap

$41.6M

Per year, if each site matched the portfolio's own best

Setting the standard

DEMO · Marsden Point–Wiri corridor

Composite 100/100

Performance spread

100 pts

DEMO · Marsden Point–Wiri corridor to DEMO · Marsden Point Terminal

Operations compared

2

Normalised on a common basis

Largest single gap

Fixed plant average health 62/100 across 42 critical assets against 84/100 at DEMO · Marsden Point–Wiri corridor — closing the 22.0-point reliability gap avoids ~$41,580,000/yr in unplanned maintenance & deferral exposure.

Site scorecards

#1

DEMO · Marsden Point–Wiri corridor

2 fixed assets · 0 fleet units · 0 stages

100

/100

Cost per tonne

—

Constraint

—

Fixed plant health
Assets at high risk
#2

DEMO · Marsden Point Terminal

42 fixed assets · 0 fleet units · 0 stages

0

/100

Cost per tonne

—

Constraint

—

Fixed plant health
Assets at high risk

What closing each gap is worth

DEMO · Marsden Point Terminal

DEMO · Marsden Point–Wiri corridor
· Fixed plant health

Fixed plant average health 62/100 across 42 critical assets against 84/100 at DEMO · Marsden Point–Wiri corridor — closing the 22.0-point reliability gap avoids ~$41,580,000/yr in unplanned maintenance & deferral exposure.

$41.6M

per year

Metric by metric

Fixed plant health

Best 84 /100 · DEMO · Marsden Point–Wiri corridor

DEMO · Marsden Point–Wiri corridor
84 /100
DEMO · Marsden Point Terminal
62 /100

Assets at high risk

Best 0% · DEMO · Marsden Point–Wiri corridor

DEMO · Marsden Point–Wiri corridor
0%
DEMO · Marsden Point Terminal
5%