On the shared screen: click chapters in the top rail, or Alt + ← / →. Alt + G shows or hides the rail. Keep this page on your phone or tablet.

Channel Infrastructure · 15-minute DEMO

Open the Ruakākā strike scenario

For Jack Stewart, GM Operations, and Rob Buchanan, CEO. Synthetic data; no live operational authority.

This chapter

-1:-1 / 2:00

Total

0:00

Chapter 1 · 2 min · /CommandCenter

Jack Stewart & Rob Buchanan: one operating picture

Their ask: “Marsden Point today”

• Channel stores, tests and pumps customer-owned fuel. Start with tank levels, two jetties, the pipeline batch and airport jet cover.
• All operating values are synthetic DEMO records, not live Channel data. Brief-supplied company facts still need source confirmation.

Click

Open a critical-work row, then compare product fill and vessel parcels.

Ask them

“Which daily operating measures do you trust today, and who owns them?”

What this chapter demonstrates

Shared scenario basis across tanks, vessels and cover.

Evidence boundary: 28 October 2026 presentation fixtures: DEMO-W01–W03; tank stock/capacity; Auckland Jet usable/demand. Not telemetry.
Accountable review: Operations duty lead, with pipeline and tank integrity owners.
Next action: Confirm the excavation report location and permit status; nominate an owner for each open evidence gap.
Verification and retained evidence: Before relying on the operating picture, reconcile timestamps, released stock and batch status with approved source records. Retain the reconciled inventory and named reviewer; unresolved reports remain unverified.

Open chapter in new tab Network corridor ↗Engineer reference packs ↗

Presenter cues only. Viewing this checklist does not verify evidence, record an approval or authorise operations.

Parking lot · questions to follow up

Channel × AssetStack · Marsden Point · 15-minute DEMO cue cards

Chapter 1 · 2 min · /CommandCenter

Jack Stewart & Rob Buchanan: one operating picture

Their ask: “Marsden Point today”

• Channel stores, tests and pumps customer-owned fuel. Start with tank levels, two jetties, the pipeline batch and airport jet cover.
• All operating values are synthetic DEMO records, not live Channel data. Brief-supplied company facts still need source confirmation.

Click

Open a critical-work row, then compare product fill and vessel parcels.

Ask them

“Which daily operating measures do you trust today, and who owns them?”

What this chapter demonstrates

Shared scenario basis across tanks, vessels and cover.

Evidence boundary: 28 October 2026 presentation fixtures: DEMO-W01–W03; tank stock/capacity; Auckland Jet usable/demand. Not telemetry.
Accountable review: Operations duty lead, with pipeline and tank integrity owners.
Next action: Confirm the excavation report location and permit status; nominate an owner for each open evidence gap.
Verification and retained evidence: Before relying on the operating picture, reconcile timestamps, released stock and batch status with approved source records. Retain the reconciled inventory and named reviewer; unresolved reports remain unverified.

Open chapter in new tab Network corridor ↗Engineer reference packs ↗

Presenter cues only. Viewing this checklist does not verify evidence, record an approval or authorise operations.

Chapter 2 · 3 min · /ChannelStrike

Ruakākā strike: airport cover becomes the clock

Their ask: “Pipeline integrity and third-party strike”

• Use the pipeline corridor link to show Ruakākā, Wiri and the airport spur; geometry is illustrative, not surveyed.
• The scenario reflects the brief’s 2017 outage story. Eighteen ML usable jet stock at three ML/day is six days without replenishment; change trucking to expose recovery assumptions.

Click

Set trucking and alternative supply to zero, then compare ten-day repair with six-day cover. Move the day slider.

Ask them

“What assured airport stock and alternative delivery capacity could operations actually call on?”

What this chapter demonstrates

Visible stock balance, assumptions and unmet demand.

Evidence boundary: Auckland Jet fixture: 18 ML usable and 3 ML/day demand; repair days and alternative-delivery inputs are scenario assumptions.
Accountable review: Pipeline operations lead, with integrity engineer and airport supply coordinator.
Next action: Confirm accessible downstream stock and deliverable alternative logistics before relying on the screening cover.
Verification and retained evidence: With trucking and other supply at zero, the DEMO should show 6.0 days cover and 12.0 ML unmet demand for a ten-day repair. Before actual restart, retain approved repair/NDT, test results, product release and signed stock reconciliation against site criteria.

Open chapter in new tab Liquid-pressure assumptions ↗Saved ILI evidence ↗

Presenter cues only. Viewing this checklist does not verify evidence, record an approval or authorise operations.

Chapter 3 · 3 min · /TankIntegrity

Which tanks need an out-of-service window?

Their ask: “Tank integrity and repurposing”

• Forty synthetic tanks include active compounds, restricted reserve and 350 ML available to repurpose.
• API 653-style records show demo readings, coating condition, due dates and NZD allowances. Dates and costs are not approved inspection intervals or budgets.

Click

Filter internals due within 18 months, inspect a record and show the ten-year forecast.

Ask them

“Which customer allocations constrain tank-cleaning and conversion windows?”

What this chapter demonstrates

A record-level trail from inspection due date to cost allowance.

Evidence boundary: DEMO-TK fixtures: internal due date, floor/shell readings, coating condition, inspectionCost and repairCost. Not certified inspection records.
Accountable review: Tank integrity engineer and customer-storage operations owner.
Next action: Confirm the inspection basis and customer allocation before selecting an out-of-service window.
Verification and retained evidence: Before accepting an interval or conversion, compare actual inspection measurements with approved design and site criteria. Retain the competent assessment, agreed outage, as-left baseline and signed return-to-service evidence; DEMO dates and allowances are not approvals.

Open chapter in new tab Customer allocations ↗Conversion planning ↗

Presenter cues only. Viewing this checklist does not verify evidence, record an approval or authorise operations.

Chapter 4 · 2 min · /FuelSecurity

Separate usable stock from restricted reserve

Their ask: “Product cover and reserve stocks”

• Northland and Auckland cover use separate downstream stock and demand assumptions.
• The 93 ML government reserve is not commercial cover. An inbound vessel is not usable airport stock until transfer, testing and release are complete.

Click

Select Auckland; toggle the inbound-release scenario and explain why that assumption fails during a pipeline outage.

Ask them

“Who authorises reserve release and reconciles physical stock across interfaces?”

What this chapter demonstrates

No reserve or vessel double-counting.

Evidence boundary: Regional product fixtures: usable, demand and inbound. DEMO-TK-R101/R102 reserve stock is excluded from commercial cover.
Accountable review: Fuel-supply coordinator, with the authorised reserve-release decision maker where applicable.
Next action: Agree the downstream inventory boundary and confirm testing, transfer and release arrangements for each parcel.
Verification and retained evidence: Auckland Jet shows 6.0 days without inbound, or 10.0 only under the explicit 12 ML released-and-transferred scenario. Reconcile physical stock and delivery records before operational use; retain release authority and prove no parcel or restricted reserve was counted twice.

Open chapter in new tab Outage sensitivity ↗Terminal inventory ↗

Presenter cues only. Viewing this checklist does not verify evidence, record an approval or authorise operations.

Chapter 5 · 3 min · /ChannelAssurance

Make maintenance capital and evidence defensible

Their ask: “Value in NZD and Certificate of Fitness”

• Fixed storage revenue is not automatically lost when the line shuts. Quantify avoidable exposure using an explicit hourly assumption, not commodity trading margin.
• The Certificate of Fitness pack is an evidence checklist, not an audit-ready claim. Confirm certificate, annual surveillance, ILI, CP, patrol and close-out records.

Click

Adjust maintenance capex and outage assumptions; open one missing evidence item.

Ask them

“Alexa Preston: what finance-approved loss basis and verified benefit criteria should a pilot use?”

What this chapter demonstrates

Exposed formulas, missing evidence and accountable review.

Evidence boundary: Value-screen input assumptions and DEMO-E1–E8 evidence gaps; saved surveillance gap pack DEMO-CI-COF.
Accountable review: Finance reviewer for the loss basis; compliance lead and competent verifier for surveillance evidence.
Next action: Agree a finance-approved avoidable-loss basis and assign owners to missing certificate and surveillance attachments.
Verification and retained evidence: Before pilot acceptance, check capex = revenue × percentage and exposure = avoided hours × avoidable hourly loss. Retain finance sign-off and independently verified benefit evidence; close surveillance gaps only against current, in-scope source documents and competent review.

Open chapter in new tab Saved surveillance gap pack ↗Trust and model boundaries ↗

Presenter cues only. Viewing this checklist does not verify evidence, record an approval or authorise operations.

Chapter 6 · 2 min · /EnergyPrecinct

SAF, biofuels, LNG and battery assets

Their ask: “Onboard future assets without losing governance”

• Future onboarding starts with ownership, consent basis, design data and criticality, then commissioning evidence and release.
• The 120 ML tank opening and Higgins interface illustrate handover needs, not completed demo acceptance packs.

Click

Show one future asset path, then the existing readiness tools.

Ask them

“Jack and Rob: which tank group and pipeline evidence set should anchor a bounded pilot?”

What this chapter demonstrates

A staged onboarding path with human acceptance gates.

Evidence boundary: Future onboarding roadmap and synthetic 120 ML jet compound. Brief-supplied company facts require source confirmation.
Accountable review: Accountable project asset owner, commissioning lead and independent competent verifier.
Next action: Select a bounded pilot asset and agree ownership, consent basis and commissioning acceptance requirements.
Verification and retained evidence: Before operational release, measure performance against the approved design, OEM and site criteria. Retain applicable design, NDT, settlement, leak-test, overfill/fire-system and product-quality evidence with signed acceptance; roadmap completion is not commissioning approval.

Open chapter in new tab Channel handover gaps ↗Readiness tools ↗

Presenter cues only. Viewing this checklist does not verify evidence, record an approval or authorise operations.